Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 12:55 am
by fred lui
嗯...
那我最近要來試試用 ver 3.62再把 advanced orch重轉成 GIGA format 一次.
看看會不會比較好
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:09 am
by Digital_Vox
今天找了好久終於找到年前買的translator.明天來試試到底translator轉的細還是cdxtract轉的細. translator最機車的就是不穩定...常常蛋我的機...$#&%%.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2002 7:53 am
by fred lui
今天試了 一下.
好像是一模一樣.
3.5 and 3.62; no difference.
I mean Advanced orchestra.
而且今天我覺得聲音沒有比較差 (with E6400 ultra)
因為GIGA default volume is 96.
Ignoring the volume, make the level the same,
Giga不會比較差
只是有些沒轉好的音色可能要花一點功夫修一下
(Frontier dakota+tango24)
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 6:26 pm
by Digital_Vox
剛小試了CDxtract 3.5跟ChickenSys Translator的不同.
一樣的音色來轉成Giga format. 在CDxtract跟Translator上有很多不同.
Sample CD: EMU Classic Vol.7
Selected Bank:WrltzrMedDynamic
Software:
ChickenSysTranslator/CDxtract
**Mix/layer**
Pan= 1 / Pan= 0
**Release Velocity Response**
Nonlinear / Linear
Dynamic Range: different
**EG/LFO1**
Decay time: different
Release time: different.
最後覺得Translator轉的是我比較想要的. 不過這是在EMU的sample CD上.
下次試試AKAI的Sample CD再S-converter,translator and cdxtract上有什麼不同.